🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be slashed by more than half, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years building local support and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their seats.