Conversing Across the Gap: Perspectives on Immigration and Society
Introducing the Individuals
Steve, 64, Canvey Island
Profession: Retired underwriter
Voting record: Typically Tory, except when he lived in “the socialist republic of south Hackney” and supported the SDP
Amuse bouche: His focus in underwriting was hostage situations: People often claim that insurance is dull, but it’s far from it when you’re discussing rescuing people from the Korean peninsula because the DPRK have opened the weapon systems”
Eva, twenty-five, London
Profession: Psychology graduate
Political history: In her home country, New Zealand, she voted a combination of Labour and Green
Interesting fact: Eva has been employed as a singer on ocean liners; her longest trip was half a year, which is a long time to be on a boat
Initial impressions
She: Steve appeared focused on enjoying the meal, to be open
Steve: She came across as a very intelligent, articulate, nice person
Eva: I had a caprese salad, pasta with fungi, and a rich sweet treat, it was very good
The big beef
Eva: He was certainly on the side of immigration being reduced. He believes that British people who already live here, including non-white Caucasian Britons, face limited access to the things that they need, because more and more people are entering. Whereas I just don’t think the figures are so problematic
Steve: I’m for qualified migrants, I don’t want to live in a homogeneous, WASP country with warm beer. But I believe that authorities have used immigration to occupy positions they struggle to staff without increasing salaries. Wages are suppressed, so taxes have to be kept low, so we can’t do things better – allocate additional funds on childcare, on schooling, on technology
She: I am not deeply informed of Brexit, because I was 16 and not living here when it occurred. He clarified it to me in a new light. He informed me about EU labor migrants – candidates could arrive in the UK and receive solely the salary of the their nation of origin
Steve: Macron spent 24 months getting the EU to abolish the system; it was reformed in two thousand eighteen. Previously, migrant laborers coming in were undercutting local employees. Under Gordon Brown, it was petroleum staff that were brought in; later it’s been hospitality, farms. She understood that, because she’d worked on a passenger vessel and said she was paid a lot more than international colleagues
Common ground
Steve: It would be great to have a alternative power, come off of oil. I don’t like pollution, I love the clean air, I love the countryside. We found consensus on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of the Scandinavian nation?” Their energy revenues soared after Ukraine started, they used that money to build eco-friendly systems
She: So we’re dependent on their petroleum. You can see that’s not a good way to proceed. He was in favour of continuing our own oil exploration for the limited quantity we’ll require in the coming years. I partially concur with him. We’re still going to rely on air travel. We both think we should be moving towards greener solutions, turbine fields and water power
Dessert topics
She: We briefly discussed Islamophobia, though we didn’t call it that. He seemed worried by extremism coming here – he did mention that a many individuals in the Arab world were radical, which I didn’t think fair. I think it’s prejudiced to make judgments based on religion
Steve: I hail from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to Whitechapel, and she said it had been gentrified. Obviously, I would say that: full of yuppies. But when I go down Chrisp Street market, I appear out of place. People gaze at me because it’s become predominantly Islamic. She gave a slight glance at me about that. I used the word “ghetto”. Eva’s got Eastern European roots – she objects to the term, to her it denotes poverty. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes their own.” I agreed to use a different word – maybe enclave?
Eva: I feel like Muslim people are really overrepresented in the news outlets as engaging in misconduct. It seems a somewhat racist, or prejudiced against foreigners
Takeaway
He: I think we parted on good terms. We had a hug at the train stop
She: We both said that we’d had a lovely time